CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE:
Rep. Campbell Addresses California Institute’s
Advisory Board
49 California Members Ask for Elk Hills Payment
to State
Delegation Circulating letter on Commercial
Space Act
Senate Banking Reports Securities Litigation
Bill
Berman Increases SCAAP Funding For Immigrant
Incarceration with Gallegly’s Help;
Entire 52-Member Delegation
Signs SCAAP Letter
House Subcommittee Reports H-1B Visa Increase
Senate Judiciary Reports Copyright Liability
Bill
House Passes Emergency Supplemental; Clinton
Will Sign
Letter Seeks Support for CUEREC Expansion;
More than Half of Californians Have Signed
California Farm Bureau Calls On Capitol City
E-Commerce Examined By House Commerce Committee
As Deadline Looms, ISTEA Conference Still at
Work
California Home Sales Prices Spike Upward
McKeon Backs DOD Panel’s Recommendation on
Cross-Service Management for Range Assets
Lofgren, CHI and ALF Brief Californians
on Hepatitis C
California Cities Called “Worst Case” in HUD Affordable
Housing Report
California Leads in Manufacturing Jobs by a Longshot
49 CALIFORNIA MEMBERS ASK FOR ELK HILLS PAYMENT TO
STATE
California is waiting for its payment from
its share of the sale of the Elk Hills Naval Petroleum Reserve, said 49
members of the California congressional delegation in a letter sent last
month to Rep. Ralph Regula, Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee
on the Interior. The letter requests that the first installment of
the payment, in the amount of $36 million, be included in this year’s Interior
appropriations bill.
In 1996, Congress authorized the sale of the
Elk Hills Naval Petroleum Reserve and created a process by which to pay
California for its claims to two sections of land within Elk Hills.
However, the letter said, the “selling of Elk Hills has substantially reduced
pressures for Interior Appropriations . . . Our people are frustrated by
the lack of progress in resolving this issue.” As part of the
$3.65 billion sale of Elk Hills, a total of $324 million was set aside
for California.
DELEGATION CIRCULATING LETTER ON COMMERCIAL SPACE
ACT
The bipartisan California Congressional delegation
is asking Senators Boxer and Feinstein for their support and co-sponsorship
of H.R. 1702, the Commercial Space Act of 1997. Passed unanimously
by the House last November and under consideration by the Senate Commerce,
Science, and Transportation Committee, the letter asks the Senators to
consider the importance of the bipartisan measure to the state.
H.R. 1072 would allow federal licensing of
the nation’s reusable launch vehicles to be landed, as well as launched
from the United States. The letter states, “This provision alone
will affect the activities in California of six aerospace companies–Lockheed
Martin, Kelly Space and Technology, Rotary Rocket, Pioneer Rocketplane,
Space Access, and Universal Space Lines–and is critically needed to provide
the stable regulatory environment that will allow this emerging industry
to flourish.”
The measure would also improve the regulatory
process for America’s commercial remote sensing industry to allow more
use of satellite information for environmental protection and “precision
farming.”
Seventeen members of the delegation have already
signed the letter. Members wishing to sign the letter should contact
Dave LesStrang in Rep. Lewis’s office at x55861 or Sherry Greenberg in
Rep. Roybal-Allard’s office at x51766.
SENATE BANKING REPORTS SECURITIES LITIGATION
BILL
On Wednesday, the Senate Banking Committee
favorably reported out S. 1260, a bill to close a loophole in the 1995
Private Securities Litigation Act. S. 1260, the Securities Litigation
Uniform Standards Act of 1997, requires that all class-action securities
litigation cases of nationally traded stocks must be brought in federal
court. Since the enactment of the 1995 Act, plaintiffs lawyers began
end running the new law by bringing suit in state courts, which generally
have looser pleading standards and discovery rules. The vote to report
the bill was 14-4.
The bill won the support of the majority of
members of the Securities and Exchange Commission when the Committee amended
it to allow class-action suits with fewer than 50 plaintiffs to continue
to be brought in state court. The bill had initially cut the exemption
off at 25 parties.
The companion bill in the House, H.R. 1689,
is also expected to see action soon. Reps. Anna Eshoo (Atherton)
and Rick White (WA) are the authors of the House version. Both the
Senate and House leadership have indicated that they want to bring the
bills to the floor before the Memorial Day recess.
The bills are strongly supported by California’s
information technology industry, which has been hard hit in the past by
frivolous securities lawsuits.
BERMAN AMENDMENT INCREASES SCAAP FUNDING FOR IMMIGRANT
INCARCERATION WITH GALLEGLY’S HELP; ENTIRE 52-MEMBER DELEGATION SIGNS SCAAP
LETTER
Rep. Howard Berman (Mission Hills) successfully
amended the Department of Justice reauthorization bill to extend the authorization
for criminal alien incarceration cost funding and increase the funding
levels. Rep. Berman’s amendment, co-sponsored by Rep. Elton Gallegly
(Simi Valley), was added during the House Judiciary Committee mark up of
H.R. 3303 on Wednesday. The amendment extends the authorization under the
State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) to reimburse the states
for the costs of incarcerating illegal criminal immigrants through FY 2001.
The current authorization is set to expire after FY2000. Rep. Berman’s
amendment also increases the authorized funding levels to $750 million
for FY1999, $800 million for FY2000, and $850 million for FY2001.
Currently, SCAAP is authorized at $650 million.
In FY1996 it cost California about $420 million
to incarcerate illegal criminal aliens, of which the federal government
reimbursed about $250 million.
In the meantime, for the second year in a
row, all 52 members of the California Congressional Delegation have signed
a letter to Rep. Hal Rogers (KY), Chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee
on Commerce, Justice, State. The letter urges Chairman Rogers to
fund the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) at $650 million
for FY99 and asks for his assistance in ensuring that the Department of
Justice disburses SCAAP funds in a timely manner (see Bulletin, Vol. 5,
Nos. 13 (4/9/98)
& 14 (4/23/98)).
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS H-1B VISA INCREASE
The House Judiciary Committee’s Immigration
and Claims Subcommittee reported H.R. 3736, the Workplace Improvement and
Protection Act, on Thursday by voice vote. The bill increases the
number of H-1B skilled worker visas from the current level of 65,000 to
95,000 for this year, with an eventual level of 115,000 in the year 2000.
The bill also requires employers seeking the visas to attest that an American
worker will not be laid off to fill a job with a foreign worker and that
they have recruited U.S. workers using industry-wide standards. In
addition, the bill would allow the Department of Labor to make random inspections
of workplaces where the employer has previously violated visa restrictions.
While reporting the bill unanimously, several
members of the Subcommittee, including Reps. Zoe Lofgren (San Jose) and
James Rogan (Glendale) indicated that they want to work with the Subcommittee
before the full Committee mark up to address various concerns. One
of the major concerns is the provision on employer attestation, which some
feel will slow down the process for getting a visa. The full Committee
may mark up the bill as early as next week.
The increase in H-1B visas is strongly supported
by the high technology industry because of critical problems finding skilled
U.S. workers. INS estimates that the current 65,000 permitted visas
will be used within the next few weeks, leaving many companies without
the ability to fill vacancies until the new fiscal year in October.
H.R. 3736 is similar to the Senate bill, S.
1723, which was reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 2.
SENATE JUDICIARY REPORTS COPYRIGHT LIABILITY
BILL
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday
approved, 18-0, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 after compromise
positions were worked out over several weeks between on-line service providers
and copyright owners. The bill, which has yet to be formally introduced,
will bring U.S. copyright law into compliance with the WIPO Copyright Treaty
and WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty agreed to in Geneva, Switzerland
on December 20, 1996. It also will provide providers of access to
the Internet with some protection against copyright litigation where a
user of the on-line service infringes on the copyright of another party.
During consideration on Thursday, several
provisions were added to the bill to address concerns raised by interested
parties. Among those provisions was one clarifying that although
the bill prohibits manufacturing and trafficking in technology primarily
designed to circumvent copyright protections, it does not extend
to technology which has a legitimate use.
The committee also added two provisions calling
for studies to address the concerns of schools and libraries. The
first study will examine the compatibility of copyright law and what is
called “long-distance learning”, which is were students “attend” classes
conducted over the Internet or by live video. The second study will
investigate whether schools and libraries need some protection from copyright
infringement allegations where students, using Internet access provided
by the institution, violate a copyright.
HOUSE PASSES EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL; CLINTON WILL
SIGN
The House on Thursday passed, 242-163, the
$5.5 billion supplemental, which will provide disaster assistance to California
and other states hard hit by this year’s El Niño storms. The
bill contains $2.6 billion for disaster relief, including $1.6 billion
for the Federal Emergency Management Agency for continued El Niño
damage, and $2.9 billion for Bosnia and Persian Gulf operations.
The resolution had been held up for weeks
in the conference committee as the House and Senate negotiated on several
controversial issues. The final agreement does not include: the $17.9
billion funding that the Clinton Administration had requested for the International
Monetary Fund; and money to pay U.S. arrearages to the United Nations.
Additionally, the bill will only offset domestic supplemental spending,
not defense spending, as the House leadership had hoped. The domestic
offsets will come primarily from the Section 8 housing program, but the
conferees agreed not to cut the Clinton Administration’s Americare program.
During consideration of the bill on the floor
Thursday afternoon, Congress received a message from the White House indicating
that President Clinton would sign the bill.
LETTER SEEKS SUPPORT FOR CUEREC EXPANSION; MORE
THAN HALF OF CALIFORNIANS HAVE SIGNED
California Members of Congress are circulating
a letter seeking appropriations of $1.5 million for FY99 for the California
Urban Environmental Research and Education Center (CUEREC) as it seeks
to expand its program to include all California universities, both public
and private. CUEREC was established by Congress in 1994 via Environmental
Protection Agency funds. It is centered at CSU Hayward, though it
has partnerships in various areas, including the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy, the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, and the Presidio
of San Francisco. Current plans include expansion to the Central
Valley, the San Diego region, and the Inland Empire, and the center hopes
to fund thirty to forty projects.
A bipartisan group of more than half of California’s
Members have signed the letter, which is set to be mailed at the end of
the week. Staff to Members wishing to sign the letter should contact
Chris Walker with Rep. Tom Lantos at x53531.
For more information regarding the organization
or its activities, contact Sam Doctors at CUEREC (510-885-4822), or Beth
Buehlmann at the CSU Washington office (202-639-9309), or visit CUEREC
at http://barney.sbe.csuhayward.edu/~cuerec.
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU CALLS ON CAPITOL CITY
This week, representatives of the California
Farm Bureau Federation were in Washington, D.C. to meet with the Administration
and Congress. California is the nation’s leading agriculture producer
with $24.7 billion in 1996; the state produces more than 11 percent of
the national gross cash receipts for farming.
In meetings with U.S. Department of Agriculture
and Environmental Protection Agency officials, members of the California
congressional delegation and Senators, and the Chilean embassy, Farm Bureau
members discussed, among other agriculture issues, implementation of the
1997 Food Quality Protection Act, creation of a pilot guest farm worker
program, and reform of the Endangered Species Act.
Led by California Farm Bureau Federation Vice
President Doug Mosebar, the delegates represented the California Farm Bureau’s
more than 75,000 member families in 56 counties on this bi-annual trip.
The California Farm Bureau is the state’s largest farm organization.
For additional information, visit their web site at http://www.cfbf.com.
E-COMMERCE EXAMINED BY HOUSE COMMERCE COMMITTEE
A hearing was held Thursday, another in a
series by the House Commerce Committee to focus on electronic commerce:
“The Marketplace of the 21st Century.” Chairman Tom Bliley
(VA) opened the day’s discussions by saying he did not intend to view the
21st century economy through the eyes of 20th century regulations and looked
forward to learning more about electronic commerce. In his opening
statement, Congressman Edward Markey (MA) encouraged the Committee to develop
policies that would maximize benefits for everyone using the Internet.
Committee member Anna Eshoo (Atherton) looked forward to a discussion on
the role of the federal government in electronic commerce. She believes
the Committee should examine whether the existing rules that govern a paper-based
economy make sense for a economy based on electronic commerce.
Representatives from America On Line, Inc.,
the SABRE Group Holdings Inc., Mastercard International, and Cdnow described
the present structure of, and their firms’ experiences with, electronic
commerce. According to their written testimony, by the end of 1997,
100 million people were connected to the Internet worldwide and 10 million
people had made purchases over the Internet. Traffic on the Internet
is reportedly doubling every 100 days.
Common policy concerns cited by the industries
using electronic commerce were fears of hastily-enacted government regulation
of the still-mostly-unprofitable medium; non-uniform taxation of goods
transacted by electronic commerce; privacy and security of electronic transactions;
and accessibility to the Internet. Some said immediate action that
the federal government could take would be to help build consumer confidence
in using electronic commerce.
Also testifying at the hearing were representatives
from the Corporation for National Research Initiatives, Technological Partners,
Forbes ASAP, and Professor David Farber of the University of Pennsylvania.
For a copy of the testimony, please contact the Committee at 202/225-2927
or by e-mail at [email protected].
Testimony should soon be available on the Committee’s web site at http://www.house.gov/commerce.
AS DEADLINE LOOMS, ISTEA CONFERENCE STILL AT WORK
As negotiations continue, the nation’s transportation
laws that had been kept alive until May 1st by a short-term extension
passed last fall, will expire on Friday without another short-term extension
or full six-year ISTEA reauthorization to take their place. Another
short-term extension appeared unlikely this week, as key negotiators said
another extension would not speed along, and could perhaps hinder, conference
negotiations. Expect the first and hardest hit to be small states
and local transportation agencies which do not have enough of their own
resources to continue transportation programs without federal dollars.
While conferees continue to debate the larger
financing issues, they did reach agreement on several policy and technical
issues. Among their reported compromises were: permit contractors
to do environmental impact statements as well as subsequent design work;
allow small urban areas (25,000 or less) to use capital grants for both
capital and operating costs for transit projects; require financing plans
for highway or transit projects greater than $1 billion; and retain the
current structure of the metropolitan planning process in addition to technical
changes suggested by conference staff.
In a letter dated April 28th sent to
California’s conferees (Senator Boxer and Reps. Kim (Diamond Bar), Filner
(San Diego), Horn (Long Beach) and Rohrabacher (Huntington Beach), California
Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans) Deputy Director Andrew Poat highlighted
state priorities in reauthorizing the transportation laws. (Note:
Reps. Rohrabacher and George Brown (San Bernardino) have now joined the
conference negotiations; Rep. Rohrabacher on the consideration of budget
issues and Rep. Brown on provisions relating to transportation research.)
The letter says the state should receive a
return on its contributions to the Highway and Mass Transit Trust Funds
consistent with the state’s rate of return under the original ISTEA law.
According to Caltrans’ calculations, that “means the state should receive
approximately $19.6 billion over the next six years, still contributing
$600 million to the national transportation interests.” The letter
also thanked conferees for their efforts so far in creation of a Border
Infrastructure program and a pilot program under the U.S. Department of
Transportation to coordinate NEPA/CEQA.
Caltrans also discussed highway formula factors
that would increase California’s share if given more weight, such as total
trust fund contributions, population, interstate lane miles, and non-National
Highway System vehicle miles traveled. Other less favorable factors
like the number of deficient/functionally obsolete bridges and diesel fuel
usage should be emphasized less to increase the state’s share of the formula
funds. Finally, Caltrans believes that funding for high priority
projects listed in the House bill should instead be distributed through
the highway formula programs and projects selected by existing planning
processes.
CALIFORNIA HOME SALES PRICES SPIKE UPWARD
Sales prices of existing California homes
jumped in March by 10.5% from the same month one year ago, and sales volume
rose 14.8%, according to figures this week from the California Association
of Realtors and Transamerica. The median price for a single-family
home in California rose to $196,400 in March 1998 from $177,740 in March
1997, and the median condominium price rose to $151,440 from $133,940 in
March 1997.
Nearly every region in the state saw a year-over-year
increase in median home sales prices, with the largest increases experienced
in Santa Clara County (up 20.2% to $351,160), the Bay Area generally (up
13.1% to $312,300), Monterey (up 13.1% to $276,440), Orange County (up
12.3% to $246,390), Ventura (up 11.9% to $224,830), and San Diego (up 9.9%
to $198,300).
The real estate market has become more brisk,
according to the figures, with the median number of days it took to sell
a single-family home declining from 53 in March 1997 to 41 in March 1998.
For further information or more detailed figures,
see the C.A.R. home page at http://www.car.org/newsstand/news/april98-2.html.
MCKEON BACKS DOD PANEL’S RECOMMENDATION ON CROSS-SERVICE
MANAGEMENT FOR RANGE ASSETS
A March 1998 report by the Pentagon’s Defense
Science Board urges the creation of a unified cross-service management
structure for testing sites in the western U.S. The report proposes
creation of an “All-Service Range Command” once appropriate study and site
selection is completed, and suggests that the concept be built around the
White Sands Missile Range, Edwards Air Force Base, and China Lake.
Rep. Buck McKeon (Santa Clarita) wrote last
week to House National Security Chairman Floyd Spence to support the recommendation
and suggest expanding the concept to include the Point Mugu Naval Air Station,
Nellis Air Force Base, and the Utah Test and Training Range. McKeon
wrote, “Unifying the operation of DOD’s range assets will not only save
money, but will demonstrate to Congress how military installations can
be jointly managed,” adding that the concept could then be expanded to
other installations.
The installations discussed, as well as other
testing and training facilities in California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona and
New Mexico, are considered part of the Southwest Defense Complex.
For further information, contact the Southwest Defense Alliance at 805-723-6103
or send e-mail to [email protected].
LOFGREN, CHI AND ALF BRIEF CALIFORNIANS ON HEPATITIS
C
California delegation staff members were briefed
Wednesday by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (San Jose) and by representatives of the
California Healthcare Institute and the American Liver Foundation regarding
the status of hepatitis C. According to the panel, more than 500,000
Californians are infected with hepatitis C, out of a total of 3.9 million
persons nationwide, which places the prevalence rate at about five times
that of HIV. Spread of the disease is primarily blood borne, with
transmission methods similar to those of the virus which causes AIDS.
The only known treatment, interferon alpha, only works in 20% of patients,
and half the time only incompletely. Because the disease typically
lies dormant for twenty years, many people may not realize that they carry
the disease and could transmit it to others.
Presenters highlighted the need for additional
diagnostic work, and for the development of successful treatments and vaccines.
To date, federal funding for research has been negligible. Presenters
are seeking $404 million for NIH research over seven years, including $56
million for the upcoming year. A large portion of those funds could
be spent in California, given the state’s strength in medical research.
For further information, contact CHI at 619-551-6677
or refer to a February 1998 report on hepatitis C by the California Center
for Health Improvement which is available in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format
at http://www.cchi.org/pdf/HWHC.pdf.
CALIFORNIA CITIES CALLED “WORST CASE” IN HUD AFFORDABLE
HOUSING REPORT
The federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development this week released “America’s Affordable Housing Crisis,” a
report detailing shortages of affordable housing in 43 metropolitan areas
across the country, including six in California. According to HUD
calculations, California accounts for 753,000 of the nation’s 5.3 million
very-low-income households which face unaffordable rents or substandard
living conditions, and therefore require housing assistance. (HUD
identified households with less than 50% of the area’s median income and
which pay more than half their incomes for rent or are living in severely
substandard housing.)
According to the report, these renter households
include 401,000 in the Los Angeles area; 123,000 in the Bay Area; 74,000
in the San Diego area; 68,000 in the San Bernardino-Riverside area; 54,000
in Orange County; and 33,000 in Sacramento.
Review of the data in the report indicates
that HUD thinks California’s very poor are considerably more likely to
need housing help than their urban counterparts in other states.
The percentage of very-low-income renters with “worst case needs” in the
six California metro areas ranges from 41% (in Sacramento) to 48% (in Los
Angeles and San Diego). That percentage in most of the other 43 U.S.
metro areas examined is in the 25% to 40% range.
For more detail, refer to the HUD website
at http://www.hud.gov/worscase.html.
CALIFORNIA LEADS IN MANUFACTURING JOBS BY A LONGSHOT
According to the “1996 Annual Survey of Manufacturers
– Geographic Area Statistics,” released Wednesday by the Census Bureau,
California has nearly twice as many manufacturing jobs as the next state.
The report estimates that there are 1.9 million manufacturing jobs in the
state, followed by just over a million in Ohio, and then Texas and New
York. California’s level represents a continued increase above the
manufacturing employment base in 1993 through 1995, including a rise of
15,000 over the 1995 level, although it remains 165,000 jobs behind the
recorded peak experienced in 1987.
Nationwide, 18.7 million Americans were employed
in manufacturing establishments in 1996, a level which represents a decline
of 63,000 from 1995, but which remains higher than any other year measured
this decade. All of these figures are for all employment at manufacturing
establishments — roughly two-thirds of employees at such firms are considered
production workers.
For more detail, the 146-page report from
the Census Bureau is available in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format at http://www.census.gov/prod/3/98pubs/m96-as3.pdf.
Click
here to return to the California Institute home page. Or click
here to send us e-mail.